Antler Post |
What I believe it means is the photographer needs to put all the elements of the picture into consideration. Subject matter-yes, light, patterns, color, perspective and point of interest, to name a few. Other artists do this, painters for instance, have to skillfully employ all the ingredients" in their "toolbox" if a painting is to be successful, irregardless of subject. They (and we, as photographers) also need to figure our how to "build" a good picture. Perhaps it's just recording something-a subject that interests us. Or an event. A mood or feeling or emotion. Telling a story. There is no wrong subject. But after that, how?
Firstly, cameras don't matter in making a good picture. Period. "Wow, that's a really good picture, you must have a really expensive camera!" Ahh no. Technically, sure, some are better suited than others-long lenses for wildlife, birding, wide angle for landscapes, short zooms for portraits. Any camera can make a good picture, it's the decisions of the person pressing the shutter that are vastly more important. When am I gonna have good light? Wait, what direction is the light? Is that distracting in the background? What if I get lower for a different perspective? What if I crop that little corner out? Just a few things to think of in the hours or seconds before pressing the shutter.
I'll admit-I'll say "shooting" and "taking a picture" or "capturing" an image-these phrases are too hard wired, so no, I'm not a purest in sticking to "making a picture." I recall noted wildlife photographer Jim Brandenberg explaining using a flashlight to highlight an evening shot and addressing if that was okay. "Does it matter?" "Is that important" "Sometimes you just have to make it work," he said. I agree. I have no problem doing post production-Film masters like Ansel Adams did it years ago-tweeking photographs in an image editor is just as much a part of making a better picture as dark room work was a hundred years ago. (Journalistic photographs are a different subject)
What got me thinking about this whole subject is the above picture. I wanted to shoot something of interest on this walk-the light was good, it was early enough in the day, but I wasn't seeing any pictures. It happens. At times to break that block, I just start firing away, knowing that nothing I'm getting will be of any worth, but it sometimes primes the pump. I wandered around the 'hood and found a dropped deer antler. Small, nothing special, but I do like finding them, wondering about when the buck lost it, where he is now, what he'll look like next fall. I like the smoothness of it, polished on some small alder last September and October. I carried it along thinking it's not enough for a picture. Yet. The Reed farm still has some remnant old wood fence standing here and there. Rusted barbed wire wrapped on some, ceramic insulators on others. The corner post I approached divided long gone cattle from the crop fields along a tractor path. A fallen blue bird house hung there, with some interesting ochre color clinging to the wood. The strands of wire seemed like it would work to wrap the antler-and soon I had an impromptu still life. Some colors repeated in the antler and insulator, some good contrast between smooth polished and textured wood and a small dash of color. Though the bokah isn't perfect from an iphone, it does well enough to dull the background and get focus where I wanted it. Award winning image? Hardly, but I could walk away happy enough that I made something that interested me, and yes, I made a picture. Guilty.
Sometimes, we just need to make it work.
No comments:
Post a Comment